Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
As being the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become reached, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The ruling of the first court created case legislation that must be accompanied by other courts right up until or unless either new legislation is created, or a higher court rules differently.
Unfortunately, that was not accurate. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son advised his parents that the boy experienced molested him. The boy was arrested two days later, and admitted to obtaining sexually molested the pair’s son several times.
a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
PLR can be a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Because of this, basically citing the case is more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think of it as calling someone to inform them you’ve found their dropped phone, then telling them you live in this kind of-and-this sort of community, without actually supplying them an address. Driving throughout the neighborhood trying to find their phone is probably going to get more frustrating than it’s truly worth.
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling within the same form of read more case.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. If the appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then solution the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 times for that department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided through the decision from the Supreme Court in the case of Dr.
ten. Based over the findings in the inquiry committee, this petition just isn't viewed as maintainable and is therefore liable to get dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
Because of their position between the two main systems of law, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of law.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a properly-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.